A change order request (COR) is the contractor's written proposal asking the owner to change the contract's scope, price, or schedule. It becomes a binding change only when it is approved as a change order.
Plan reviews connect field conditions, drawings, and the next decisions on a job. AI-generated illustration.
A change order request is the paperwork that starts most changes. The contractor sees something that is outside the contract, describes it, prices it, and sends it to the owner or architect. Some contracts call it a change proposal, a potential change order (PCO), or a request for change. AIA's G709 Work Changes Proposal Request runs the other direction: it is the architect asking the contractor to price a possible change.
A COR is not approval. Until the owner signs a change order, the money is unearned and the scope is still in question. That gap is where contractors lose money.
A clear scope description with drawing and spec references.
A cost breakdown: labor hours and rates, material, equipment, subcontractor quotes, and markup per the contract.
The schedule impact in days, or a statement that time is reserved.
A response deadline and a note on what happens to the schedule if the answer comes late.
How a COR works on a real job
Say a drywall sub on a $6 million office building gets RFI 42 answered: the architect adds a rated shaft wall at the elevator lobby that was not on the bid drawings. The sub writes COR 7 for 1,200 square feet of shaft wall at $14,600 including markup and two additional days. The GC reviews it, adds its own markup, and sends it to the owner as GC COR 19 for $16,060. The owner's rep asks for backup on the labor hours, gets it, and signs change order 11 two weeks later.
Two weeks of waiting is normal. Two months is a problem, especially if the sub has already built the wall. Track the age of every open request, and raise the oldest ones at every owner meeting until they close.
Why change order requests stall
Missing backup. Owners will not approve a lump sum with no breakdown.
No reference to the trigger, so the owner argues the work was in the base scope.
Requests submitted weeks after the work, past the notice window in the contract.
Too many small CORs sent one at a time. Some owners respond faster to a weekly batch.
The owner's approver changes and nobody re-sends the open list.
No. It is a proposal. It becomes binding when both parties sign a change order or the owner issues a change directive for the work.
What is the difference between a COR and a PCO?+
Terms vary by company. A potential change order is often an internal placeholder for a possible change; a COR is the priced request sent to the owner. Some firms use the terms interchangeably.
Should I start work before a COR is approved?+
Only if you have a written directive to proceed. Starting on an unapproved request is the most common way contractors end up doing free work.
How long should an owner take to respond?+
The contract may set a response time. If it does not, put a requested response date on the COR and follow up weekly.
Lemartec (A MasTec Company): The Vertical Construction Specialists Few construction companies can claim expertise in both horizontal infrastructure and vertical building. Lemartec's integration within the MasTec family creates unique capabilities: they can build the power plant and the transmission lines, construct the airport and install the runway lighting, develop the port and build the ships that use it. This integrated approach eliminates coordination challenges that plague projects requiring multiple specialized contractors.
Suffolk Construction (Florida Division): The Technology-Forward Builders Suffolk's technology investments focus on eliminating the unexpected. Their predictive analytics identify potential delays before they happen, their virtual construction models reveal conflicts before they're built, and their real-time project tracking ensures every stakeholder has accurate information. This technological sophistication allows them to guarantee outcomes that other contractors can only hope to achieve.
Starts muted when the player comes into view.
Read the full episode transcript
Published transcript from Scaling Legends. It may contain transcription errors. View the source transcript.
Welcome to Scaling Legends, the podcast where growth -minded construction leaders unlock the systems and strategies behind building generational companies. This is Deep Dive, the segment where we uncover how real founders are scaling from 5 million to 50 million and beyond without losing control of quality, culture, or cash flow. Today's episode is brought to you by SmartBusinessAutomator .com, the operations engine. Behind modern construction firms that want to scale smarter, not harder. If you're dealing with project delays, chaotic scheduling, dropped balls on follow -ups or manual bottlenecks, Smart Business Automator helps you. Automate back -office workflows and change order follow -ups. Streamline subcontractor
coordination and client communication. Track bids, leads and financials in one clean dashboard. Free up your time to focus on building, hiring, and closing bigger deals. Because in construction, scale without systems is just stress. Now, let's deep dive. All right, today on The Deep Dive, we're looking at a really interesting set of sources focused on construction companies, mostly down here in the Southeast. We're specifically digging into firms operating right here in Florida. Yeah, that's right. We've got... profiles, some research notes detailing the strategies, the approaches of some, well, some seriously prominent players in the region. We're talking about companies like Lamar Tech, Suffolk Construction, Ajax Building
Company, Wharton Smith. Exactly. And the thing is, they're not just putting up buildings. They're building really distinct models for success, especially in what can be a pretty challenging environment. Absolutely. And if you're out there maybe building your own company or working your way up in this industry, you definitely know the pressures. Just imagine for a moment if you could just wipe out the biggest coordination headaches. on your projects what would that actually mean for your timelines your stress levels maybe or think about scheduling and budget like what's the biggest bottleneck the biggest frustration you run into trying to keep projects on the rails budget wise and time wise yeah or maybe what would success look like for you if you knew you could build structures that could truly stand
up to anything the florida environment decides to throw at them You know, hurricanes, humidity, all of it. Let's just explore that idea for a second. What if those obstacles you're facing, maybe they aren't really obstacles. Maybe they're opportunities just waiting for you to figure them out. That's really what we want to do in this deep dive. We want to pull out those key nuggets of knowledge from these company stories. You know, what are they doing differently? What actually takes a construction company from just good to genuinely great, especially how they tackle challenges and embrace change? Let's try and unpack this. Okay, sounds good. Let's kick off with Lamar Tech. They're a mass tech company, which is, well, pretty significant. What's really insightful here is understanding their background. Mass tech was already huge, right? But mostly
in horizontal infrastructure. Horizontal. So like pipelines, transmission lines, that kind of heavy civil work. Exactly. Lamar Tech was their strategic move, their way into vertical construction. Building buildings. Ah. OK, so they basically decided, let's build the buildings that connect to or sit next to all the infrastructure we already built. That's quite a shift. It's more than just a shift, really. It's a strategic integration. The source we looked at calls it their integration advantage. See, most companies, they do one or the other, right? Horizontal or vertical. Right. Being part of MassTech, let's Lamar Tech offer this unique full service capability. Okay. So how does that integration actually give them an edge or, you know, make
things better for their clients? Well, it hits those coordination headaches you mentioned right on the head. Think about building, say, a power plant. Okay. You need the actual plant structure, the vertical part, and you need the transmission lines connecting it out. to the grid, the horizontal part, or an airport terminal you need the building, but also all the complex runway lighting systems. LamarTech, because they can leverage the whole MassTech network, they can handle both sides of that equation. So they get rid of those awful handoff problems, the delays, the finger -pointing, the scheduling nightmares that pop up when you've got two different specialist companies trying to mesh perfectly. Exactly. They become the single point of responsibility for all those interconnected pieces. Also pointed out, they were recognized as top minority construction firm of the year for the Southeast. Oh,
interesting. Yeah. And it's not just like an award for the shelf. It seems to reflect a deliberate strategy. It impacts how they hire, who they subcontract with, how they engage with the communities they work in, adds another layer to their whole approach. And there was that LED example, too, right? Port Miami's Cruise Terminal F. Yeah. That sounded impressive. Building a huge terminal like half a million square feet at a super busy port. Yeah. That's complex. It is complex. And they achieved LED silver certification on it, which is key. It really shows that even on these massive high pressure commercial jobs, environmental responsibility doesn't have to be an afterthought. It was baked into the process, shows sustainability and commercial success can actually go hand in hand. And of course, being part of MassTech gives them that huge international network
reach across the Americas. If that makes sense. Integration, creating opportunity. Now, let's pivot a bit. Suffolk Construction's Florida division, the sources on them, well, they basically scream technology. Oh, absolutely. Suffolk really represents this powerful shift. You know, construction moving from maybe a primarily traditional craft based thing towards a really tech driven profession. They've invested heavily. And it sounds like they're not just using the tech that's out there. They're actually like. developing it. The source mentioned innovation labs working on VR, AI, robotics specifically for construction. That's exactly what makes them stand out. And it's not just theory or, you know, pie in the sky stuff. the source gives real examples we're talking designing
entire buildings in virtual reality before a shovel hits the ground wow using ai to optimize construction schedules based on like learning from past projects using drones for quick accurate quality inspections right on site this is how they operate now okay this sounds like it ties into what the source called predictive excellence, which if you've ever been blindsided by surprises on a job that just wreck your schedule or budget, well, this sounds like the antidote. It really is. Their tech aims to eliminate those unknowns. AI spotting potential delays way in advance by crunching data. Virtual models showing design clashes before you order materials. Real -time tracking keeping everyone in the loop. So they can basically find and fix problems in the virtual world before they get these expensive,
time -consuming crises in the real world. Precisely. And that predictive power, it fundamentally changes the risk on a project. The source suggests it lets them guarantee outcomes with a much higher degree of confidence. That's huge. Yeah. And they also talk about collaborative innovation, sharing their tech progress, partnering with others in the industry, software companies, equipment makers. It suggests they believe, you know, a rising tide lifts all boats. Okay, from integration and tech, let's shift again. Ajax Building Company. The sources frame them as this southeast regional powerhouse. Over 50 years, just... Perfecting construction right here. Ajax's path, it seems, is really rooted in deep, deep local knowledge. They've spent decades mastering the very specific challenges of building in this environment.
You know, hurricane zones, the intense humidity, salt air. Right. And also managing construction in places like Florida that are just growing incredibly fast. They're consistent high rankings among regional builders really points to that mastery. Hurricane proof excellence. That sounds pretty intense. What does that actually mean on the ground? What makes them different? While it's apparently more than just following the standard building codes, it's about specialized techniques they've developed over years. For dealing with category five winds, for instance, choosing materials specifically tested to hold up against constant humidity and salt corrosion and adapting their scheduling processes to account for frequent weather delays or interruptions. The source mentioned specific methods they use for wind resistant design and also for like rapid construction
phases to get things enclosed faster during storm season. So basically, while some might see the regional climate and weather as just a major hassle, Ajax has turned mastering it into their core strength, a competitive advantage. Exactly that. They didn't just learn to build in Florida. They built their whole expertise around Florida's unique demands and their growth market mastery. It isn't just about building stuff quickly. It's understanding how to support the state's, frankly, explosive population growth. Right. They've built tons of essential facilities, schools, hospitals, commercial centers, but they do it understanding the dynamics of communities that are still growing and changing rapidly. Sounds like they build with that future growth really baked into the plan. The source also mentioned their sustainable development expertise, balancing
growth with Florida's environment. Which is absolutely critical here, right? Building responsibly in a state with Florida's natural beauty and, well, sensitivities requires a really careful balancing act. Makes sense. OK, last one. Wharton Smith. The sources describe them as the Florida infrastructure specialists. Nearly 80 years in the game, they seem to focus on the stuff that's essential, but maybe not always flashy. Absolutely. Wharton Smith is all about the foundations, the infrastructure that makes everything else work. Water treatment plants, transportation systems, utility networks, you know, the projects that are absolutely essential for a state to function and grow, even if they don't make the skyline headlines. And doing that kind of work in Florida sounds uniquely challenging, too. You mentioned the geography. Sandy soils, high water table, storm surge
risk. Yeah, it demands a very specific kind of technical specialization, as the source put it. They need deep expertise in things like advanced foundation systems that work in tricky soil and with high water tables. Innovative drainage solutions are huge dealing with seasonal floods and major storm events. And a lot of this infrastructure, it involves public money, public needs, right? So does that mean they also have to be experts? in navigating those complex public -private partnerships. The source definitely confirms that. They have significant experience there juggling public benefit, navigating complex regulations, all while ensuring commercial viability. It means mastering project finance, tricky contracts, and managing a whole bunch of different stakeholders from government agencies to private investors. That's a whole
different skill set, really, beyond just the physical construction. And the source mentioned their long -term vision. How does that play out in their projects? Well, they're building things designed to last for decades, literally. So that means factoring in future population growth projections. Considering the long -term effects of climate change, sea level rise is a big one here. And anticipating how technology might evolve, maybe in water treatment or grid management. The source notes this often involves accepting higher initial costs to get superior long -term value and resilience. It's a different calculation. Okay, so if we try to connect these threads, these different paths to greatness we've just looked at, Lummer Tech's strategic integration, Suffolk's tech -driven prediction, Ajax's deep regional specialization and
resilience, and Wharton Smith's focus on foundational infrastructure with that long -term view. What's the big takeaway here about succeeding in construction? Well, I think it clearly shows there's no single magic bullet, right? Right. Each of these companies, they identified specific challenges or maybe opportunities that were inherent in their market or their environment. And then they built their core strategy around mastering that specific thing. They didn't run away from complexity. They leaned into it. They embraced it and turned it into what makes them unique, their value proposition. clearly embraced change, too, whether that was a totally new business model like Lomartec or technological disruption like Suffolk or adapting to evolving environmental pressures like Ajax and Wharton Smith. That seems key to becoming leaders in
their specific areas. Exactly. So for you listening, maybe building your own business or trying to advance your career. These examples really highlight something important. It's about truly understanding the specific challenges you face in your market, your niche, and then finding strategic, focused ways to tackle them. That seems to be the path from just being good to being great. So think about it. What stands out to you from these different approaches? Are you wrestling with coordination issues where maybe integration could be an answer? Could technology give you a predictive edge you don't have now? Does your region have unique environmental challenges or market dynamics that if you really mastered them could set you apart? Or maybe there are foundational long -term needs in your area that you could build a strategy around delivering that lasting value. Yeah.
Building a truly resilient, successful company so often boils down to how you strategically choose to respond to the obstacles right there in your path. So given these different paths to success we've talked about today, what's maybe one area in your own business journey or your career path where embracing a challenge, leaning into a change could potentially lead to a real breakthrough? Something to think about.
