Both are enterprise-grade platforms for commercial construction, and neither publishes prices. Procore prices by product and construction volume with unlimited users. Autodesk, which now sells Autodesk Build as Forma Build, offers user, project, and account-based pricing and ties closely to its design and model tools.
Capture field information where the work happens, then route it to the people who need it. AI-generated illustration.
Choose Procore if you want one commercial platform where every owner, sub, and vendor joins at no added user cost and your fee scales with construction volume. Choose Autodesk Build (renamed Forma Build) if your projects run on Revit and Navisworks models, your preconstruction team already uses BuildingConnected, or you want to buy per user or per project instead of on volume. Both hide prices behind a quote. Both pricing pages were checked in October 2026, and Autodesk's now says Autodesk Construction Cloud is part of Autodesk Forma.
Comparison table
From vendor pages checked October 2026
Procore
Autodesk Build (Forma Build)
Published prices
No, quote only
No, quote only
Pricing model
Upfront annual fee per product based on Annual Construction Volume
User, project, or account-based
Users
Unlimited, including clients, subs, and vendors
Depends on the model you buy
Guarantee
Not stated on pricing page
30-day money-back guarantee
Preconstruction
Designs, estimates, bids, budgets
Separate bundle: ProEst, BuildingConnected Pro, Bid Board Pro, TradeTapp, Forma Takeoff, Forma Estimate
Field and project delivery
Project management, quality and safety (daily logs, inspections, incidents)
Construction Operations bundle: Forma Build, Forma Data Management, Pype AutoSpecs, Pype Closeout
Model work
Not listed as a separate area on home page
Model Management bundle: Model Coordination, Navisworks Manage, Recap Pro and more
AI
Construction-specific AI agents
Not detailed on pricing page
First, the name change
If you are searching for Autodesk Build and landing on pages about Forma, you are in the right place. Autodesk's pricing page is titled Autodesk Forma Pricing, says Autodesk Construction Cloud is now part of Autodesk Forma, and lists the field product as Forma Build. It also warns that some resources may still use older names. Use the new names when you ask for a quote so the line items match.
How pricing works
Procore charges an annual, upfront fee for each product you pick, set by your Annual Construction Volume, the total construction value you run through the platform. Users are unlimited. Field Productivity is the stated exception, priced per full-time-equivalent worker. The page also describes multi-year volume pools, pre-set rates for added volume, and renewal rate protection, and lists unlimited storage and support as included.
Autodesk's page shows no prices either. It describes flexible user, project, and account-based pricing, groups products into Model Management, Preconstruction, and Construction Operations bundles, and offers a 30-day money-back guarantee and a demo.
The models reward different companies. Take two made-up firms. A GC running $40M a year across 12 projects with 30 internal staff and 200 sub users benefits from Procore's unlimited users, but pays based on that $40M. A specialty contractor with 6 office users working inside a few large GC projects might find per-user pricing cheaper. Get both quotes on the same assumptions, and ask each to price year two and year three too.
Preconstruction
Autodesk sells a deep preconstruction stack as its own bundle. BuildingConnected Pro and Bid Board Pro handle bid invitations and tracking, TradeTapp covers subcontractor prequalification, and ProEst, Forma Takeoff, and Forma Estimate handle quantity takeoff and estimating. If your estimators already live in BuildingConnected, that is a strong pull.
Procore covers preconstruction too: designs, estimates, bids, and budgets on one platform. The advantage there is having bid, budget, and project data in the same system the field uses once the job is awarded.
Field, documents, and closeout
Procore's project management and quality and safety tools bring daily logs, inspections, and incidents together, and its mobile app links the site to the office. For a GC that needs every RFI and submittal answered by the right sub, unlimited users means that sub is already in the system.
Autodesk's Construction Operations bundle pairs Forma Build with Forma Data Management and two Pype tools: AutoSpecs, which works from project specifications, and Closeout, for closeout documents. If your closeout packages routinely run late and hold up release of retainage, ask Autodesk to demo Pype Closeout on a sample spec book.
Models and design coordination
This is Autodesk's home turf. The Model Management bundle includes Model Coordination, Design Collaboration, Navisworks Manage, Recap Pro, Assemble, Insight, and Autodesk Tandem. For a mechanical contractor running clash detection on a hospital job, being in the same ecosystem as the architect's Revit models removes file conversion steps.
Procore's home page does not list model coordination as a separate product area, so if BIM coordination drives your work, have Procore show exactly how models are viewed and shared.
Strengths and limits
Procore strength: unlimited users, so every outside party participates without seat math.
Procore strength: one platform from preconstruction through quality and safety, with AI agents.
Procore limit: pricing tied to construction volume and paid annually upfront; no public numbers.
Autodesk strength: tight fit with Autodesk design and model tools, and a broad bid management stack.
Autodesk strength: user, project, or account pricing options plus a 30-day money-back guarantee.
Autodesk limit: no public prices, and the product is split across bundles, so scope your quote carefully. Autodesk notes that some resources may still use previous product names.
Rollout effort
Either platform is a real implementation project, not a weekend setup. Budget for a project lead on your side, cleaned-up project templates, a standard cost code list, and a plan for what happens to jobs already in progress. Ask each vendor what training is included, who your implementation contact is, and how long a company your size usually takes to go live. Procore's pricing page points implementation and professional services to a separate support page, so ask whether any of it carries a fee.
Who should pick which
GC with many subs and owners who all need access: Procore's unlimited-user model is built for this.
Design-heavy or BIM-driven firm: Autodesk Build, for the model coordination ecosystem.
Estimating team already on BuildingConnected: price the Autodesk Preconstruction bundle alongside Forma Build.
Specialty contractor with a small office: get both quotes. Per-user pricing may cost less than volume pricing, or it may not.
Smart Business Automator is a newer, lighter option with published per-user pricing (Starter $19, Professional $40, Business $67, Enterprise $100 a month). It covers project tracking, invoicing, subcontractor and shipment tracking, change orders, job costing and WIP views, compliance and certified payroll preparation, and AI help with RFI drafting and document data extraction. It does not offer model coordination or the document control depth of either platform here. See our pricing.
Frequently asked questions
Is Autodesk Build the same as Forma Build?+
Yes. Autodesk's pricing page says Autodesk Construction Cloud is now part of Autodesk Forma and that ACC product names were updated. The Autodesk Build link now carries the Forma Build label.
Does Autodesk Build publish its price?+
No. As of October 2026 the pricing page offers quotes and describes user, project, and account-based pricing, with a 30-day money-back guarantee.
How does Procore price compared with Autodesk?+
Procore charges an annual upfront fee per product based on Annual Construction Volume, with unlimited users. Autodesk prices by user, project, or account. Which is cheaper depends on your volume and headcount, so get both quotes.
Which is better for BIM coordination?+
Autodesk sells a Model Management bundle with Model Coordination and Navisworks Manage, which fits teams already in Autodesk design tools. Ask Procore to demo its model viewing if BIM drives your work.
Can a subcontractor work in both?+
Yes. Subs are often invited into a GC's platform. Procore says collaborators such as subcontractors are included in its unlimited-user model.
Autodesk launched Forma Building Design with Revit as its first cloud-connected client. Data flows with zero file conversion. All AEC subscribers get it free. BIM 2.0 startups Arcol, Snaptrude, and Qonic are competing. This episode explains what cloud BIM means for contractors and why the transition is happening now.
Starts muted when the player comes into view.
Read the full episode transcript
Published transcript from Scaling Legends. It may contain transcription errors. View the source transcript.
If you've ever sat there staring at a shared folder, just looking at files named projectfinalv3 .rvt, and then right below it is projectfinal4ucithosone, and then projectactualfinalfinal. Oh yeah, the absolute worst. Right. It's just, you know, firsthand that the traditional construction workflow has been... Well, it's been fundamentally broken for a really long time. I'm Justine, by the way, and welcome to our deep dive. And I'm Nicole. And yeah, that constant anxiety -inducing loop of downloading these massive architectural models. Hoping nothing got corrupted. Exactly. Hoping the transit worked, making your specialized changes, and then just, you know, emailing them back to the architect. But that era officially dies today. It really does. So today we are unpacking a massive but strangely quiet structural shift happening
right now in construction tech. Basically, the sudden transition to a completely cloud -native ecosystem. And we're going to look specifically at how 3D building models and, you know, the overwhelming avalanche of administrative data tied to them are being completely rewired to eliminate friction for you, the contractor. Yeah. And to do this, we're pulling from a few key places. We've got recent technical launch announcements from Autodesk, some major industry moves from Trimble and Procore. And we're also pulling critical data straight from smart business. Automator's Market Intelligence Report. Right. And the narrative running through all this is really about forced evolution. I mean, the tools are changing, obviously, but more importantly, the legacy workflows that relied on fragmented info, they are being systematically
dismantled. Systematically dismantled. I like that. So, Nicole, let's start with the catalyst for this whole discussion. Back on April 7th, Autodesk launched Forma Building Design. Yep. And they established Revit. as its very first cloud -connected client, currently via a tech preview. The big headline feature they're pushing is this concept of zero file conversion. Which sounds like great marketing jargon. Exactly. But I want to get past the marketing terminology here. When we talk about data flowing with zero file conversion, what is actually mechanically happening under the hood? So mechanically, Justine, it represents a complete shift. from a file -based architecture to a database -driven one. Okay. In the old system, a 3D model of a building was basically a monolithic file. To even open it,
you needed the heavy desktop software that created it. Right, you couldn't just preview it on your phone. Exactly. And if you needed to move that model into a different program to, say, analyze sunlight or structural load, you had to translate the file. Oh, exporting it into some generic format, importing it. Then mapping the parameters. and inevitably losing a ton of metadata in the process. It was a nightmare. But with zero file conversion, the data is no longer a file. It's a granular database hosted in the cloud. So a wall isn't just a collection of digital lines anymore. It's a database entry. Yes, with highly specific properties. And when a change is made, that single entry updates instantly for anyone accessing the cloud environment. Okay, so it's basically the Google Docs concept finally arriving in 3D architectural modeling. That's a perfect
analogy. Because in Google Docs, you know, you aren't sending a Word document back and forth via email. Multiple people are manipulating the exact same underlying data point simultaneously. You literally see their cursor moving. Right. But the complexity here is just vastly different. I mean, a building model has thousands and thousands of interconnected elements. How does this cloud system... balance that need for fluid collaboration with the incredibly heavy processing power required for detailed design. Well, they do it by splitting the workload Autodesk has essentially brought level of development 200 directly into this fluid cloud environment via Forma. And just to clarify for everyone, LED 200 is basically your schematic design phase, right? Yeah, exactly. Where the general size, shape, and orientation of the building
are defined. It's light, it's fast, and you can access it in a standard web browser. Okay. But Autodesk recognizes that figuring out exactly, like, a specific piece of aluminum curtain wall physically anchors to a post -tensioned concrete slab. That still takes intense computational power. Exactly. So the granular detailing remains in desktop Revit. The real breakthrough here is that the lightweight cloud model and the heavy desktop model are reading from the exact same database in real time. So they don't need the entire weight of a fully detailed desktop application just to make collaborative schematic level decisions. Like if you're just shifting the footprint of a lobby, you don't need all that rendering power. You don't. And there's a huge economic angle to this, Justine, which dictates why this is
happening right now. Oh, for sure. Autodesk isn't just releasing form of building design as some premium expensive add -on. They are giving it away. Yep. Free, giving it away, along with site design, board, and data management, to all existing AEC collections subscribers at absolutely no additional cost. Which is how you force an immediate paradigm shift across the whole industry. By removing the financial barrier to entry for their massive subscriber base, they're basically weaponizing their market share to mandate cloud adoption. And contractors are going to see the effects of this literally overnight. I mean, if the architect moves a structural column in Forma, The contractor reviewing this schematic design sees it happen instantly. No more waiting for the Friday afternoon model upload. Right. And that direct line of
sight. translates to a massive reduction in RFIs because ambiguity is just stripped right out of the early design phase. It's huge. But, you know, Autodesk is moving aggressively here because the foundational mechanics of the industry were starting to crack under their own weight. Yeah, teams have been hitting a wall with how they coordinate these massive projects. And actually, if you look at Smart Business Automator's market intelligence report. It puts a stark number on this. Oh, yeah. That stat is wild. It is. A staggering 74 % of BIM users cite coordination as their absolute biggest pain point. I mean, when three quarters of your users flag the primary function of your tool as their biggest hurdle, your system is fundamentally broken. Completely broken. Because coordination and construction, it's a high stakes
process. It's the act of overlaying the architectural model, the structural steel model, and the MEP, the mechanical, electrical, and... plumbing models to find clashes. Right. And if coordination fails digitally, you end up on a real -world job site with like a massive HVAC duct running straight through the designated space for a structural steel beam. Exactly. And fixing that physical clash in the field, that costs tens of thousands of dollars and completely halts the project schedule. So painful. And the traditional clash detection workflow, it involved everyone uploading their individual files, a coordinator mashing them together, running a clash. report and then sending out this massive spreadsheet of errors back to the teams to fix. It was so slow. Incredibly slow. And because it was slow, a vacuum formed
in the market. We saw this massive wave of BIM 2 .0 startups emerge to exploit that exact weakness. Companies like Arcole, Snaptrude, and Quantic. Oh, yeah. And those startups had a massive structural advantage, Justine. Right, because they didn't have 20 years of legacy desktop code holding them back. Exactly. They built their core architecture specifically for the web. They utilize modern cloud infrastructure and WebGL rendering directly in the browser. Which is wild for 3D modeling. It is. They demonstrated that complex 3D modeling could be fast, highly collaborative, and entirely unchained from those massive software installations. And that competitive pressure that forced Autodesk to cannibalize its own desktop dominance just to survive the transition. Yeah, they had to
adapt. But you know, Nicole, the transition isn't isolated to just... drawing the buildings. No, not at all. If we look at the broader context of the construction tech landscape that we're covering today, the race to the cloud is happening across the entire tech stack simultaneously. Like on April 4th, Trimble acquired a company called Document Crunch. Which is a huge move. It is. And we're also looking at Procore's recent partnership with NVIDIA. This is a deliberate, unified ecosystem play. It really is the unification of risk management, physical tracking, and design. Let's look at Document Crunch for a second. It's an AI platform specifically built to analyze construction contracts. Traditionally, a contractor receives this massive, incredibly dense contract filled with complex indemnification clauses,
highly specific notice of delay requirements, you name it. Stuff that takes lawyers weeks to comb through. Right. But the AI utilizes natural language processing, which has been trained on millions of construction documents, to instantly scan the contract and flag critical risks. It literally highlights the specific clauses that could bankrupt your project if you ignore them. That's incredible. So Trimble is neutralizing the legal and contractual risk in the cloud, while Procore and NVIDIA are tackling the physical risk of the actual site itself. Procore is leveraging NVIDIA's cloud -based GPUs to create digital twins of live construction sites. And, you know, we hear digital twin thrown around constantly as a buzzword, but the mechanism here is actually fascinating. It really is. They're taking raw
data from cameras mounted on cranes or laser scans from the site and utilizing the cloud. And then the system overlays that real world point cloud directly onto the 3D design model. Down to the millimeter. Down to the millimeter. The system compares the physical reality against the digital intent. So if a concrete wall is poured, say, two inches out of plum. The system highlights that variance in red instantly. Wow. The cloud has essentially become the central nervous system connecting the legal framework, the digital geometry, and the messy physical reality of the build. That is, I mean, it's revolutionary. But this brings up a really critical structural question for me. Okay, what's that? If the design phase, the 3D model coordination, and the physical
site tracking are all suddenly moving to the cloud to operate at light speed, How on earth can a contractor's actual project management and administrative processes keep up? Ah, that is the million -dollar question. Right, because construction runs on a mountain of paperwork. You can have the fastest design software in the world, but if your project manager is still out there manually typing out daily logs or hunting through a nested folder structure for a PDF of the specific permit, the entire operation just slows to a crawl. Yeah, it becomes the new bottleneck. The operations side absolutely has to match the velocity of the design side. And that administrative bottleneck is precisely what is stalling out growth for so many mid -sized contractors right now. But this is exactly where the operational
side of this tech revolution comes into focus. Artificial intelligence is being deployed specifically to manage that exact administrative burden. Tell me more about that. Well, Smart Business Automator's market intelligence report provides a very clear roadmap of how AI is built for construction companies to scale without merely hiring, you know, armies of data entry clerks. OK, and just to be clear, we aren't talking about generic conversational chatbots here, right? Yeah. Like this isn't just asking chat GPT to write an email. Oh, no, no, not at all. We are looking at purpose build. operational engines take the mechanics of natural language search across project data, for example. The old way involved a rigid hierarchy of folders, and you basically needed an encyclopedic memory of where a specific document was filed. Folder
within a folder within a folder. Right. But with these new systems, a superintendent can just type or even speak a query like, where is the approved submittal for the third floor lighting fixtures? And the AI isn't just matching keywords and file titles, is it? Nope. It's actually reading the text inside the PDFs. It's scanning the metadata of the images and the text of the email correspondence to instantly surface the exact document you need. That is completely eliminating the friction of retrieval. Exactly. And it applies that same logic to automated categorization. When a foreman uploads 50 photos from a sidewalk, the AI scans the images, recognizes, say, the electrical rough -in work, tags the photos by location, and files them automatically. Wow. So what used to take
hours of manual sorting back in the trailer happens the second the data hits the cloud. Literally instantly. But, you know, reducing search time? That's just a baseline efficiency. The higher level project management applications are where the financial return on investment becomes truly massive. Oh, definitely. Like looking at the sources, they detail features like schedule risk detection. And this isn't just a calendar sending you an alert. It's an analytical engine. Right. Let's say a custom lighting fixture is delayed at the manufacturer. Okay. The AI reads the shipping update. It then cross -references that delay against the project's master schedule. It understands the sequence of construction. It knows that the drywall contractor cannot close up the ceiling until the electrical rough -in and those specific fixtures are installed. Oh, so the AI automatically
flags the lighting delay, not just as a singular issue, but as an active threat to the critical path of the drywall schedule next week. Precisely. It spots the bottleneck before it explodes into a scheduling conflict on the job site. It's analyzing the ripple effects across thousands of variables. And actually, it applies that same predictive analytical logic to the budget, too. Yes. The budget and variance insights. Right. According to Smart Business Automator's Market Intelligence Report, these tools scan purchasing trends, track change orders, and monitor labor hours against the original estimates. It gives project leadership visibility into exactly where a project is bleeding capital well before the end of month financial reconciliation. Which is huge. It shifts the
project manager's posture from reactive to proactive. Instead of doing autopsies on a budget overrun 30 days after it already happened, they can intervene while the work is still actually occurring. That is a massive shift. But Nicole, I'm looking at this promise of frictionless management and predictive intelligence, and my mind immediately goes to the actual physical job site. The mud and the chaos. Exactly. The site is chaotic. subcontractors change plans on the fly you open up a demolition wall and the existing conditions look nothing like the historical blueprints right a pristine cloud model rarely survives contact with the physical reality of a site so when a really complex messy request for information and rfi is generated because the physical conditions just do not match the model How does a cloud AI system actually
handle the messiness of that translation? That intersection of digital perfection and physical reality is arguably the hardest problem to solve in construction technology today. But the AI handles the messiness by synthesizing the context. How so? When a complex RFI comes in from the field, features like RFI assistance don't just blindly route the question to an engineer. The AI instantly stands the entire history of the project. Oh, wow. Yeah, it looks at the relevant structural specifications, it searches past RFIs for similar resolutions, and it drafts a highly informed technical response. So it effectively acts as a dedicated junior engineer that has memorized every single document, spec book, and email related to the project. Exactly. the solution and the human project manager simply reviews
it, edits it if necessary, and approves it. It compresses what used to be a two -hour research project into a 10 -minute verification process. That capability is powered by document intelligence, right? Yes. The AI extracts the vital esoteric details hidden deep within hundreds of pages of spec books so human operators don't miss them. That's wild. But what about the messy data collection from the field? because you know superintendents are often just dictating notes into their phones while standing next to Like an active excavator. Right, with all the background noise and the casual phrasing. Well, the AI takes those garbled, unstructured field reports, analyzes the intent behind them, and restructures them into clean, compliant, daily log summaries. No way. Way. And it even generates actionable, nice steps
assigned to the correct subcontractors. So the superintendent can just describe the chaos naturally, and the system translates it into structured, usable data. You got it. And the final piece of this operational architecture, Justine, is where the data ultimately lives. All of this field data, the daily logs, the budget variances, the approved RFIs, they flow seamlessly via APIs directly into the company's existing financial and ERP software. So the manual entry of field data into the back office financial systems is just... Completely. The data flows in a continuous, unbroken chain from the moment the superintendent logs an issue to the moment the accountant reviews the month -end billing. That is just phenomenal. Okay. Okay, let's synthesize everything we've unpacked today. From Autodesk Forma fundamentally
changing architectural models from static files into fluid, cloud -hosted databases. To AI platforms parsing complex legal contracts and automating schedule risks. Right. The overarching takeaway. hear is profound. For the first time in modern construction history, the bottleneck on a project is no longer the flow of information. The technology has officially caught up to the incredible complexity of the physical build. Which is saying something. For decades, the industry's ability to safely and profitably build was severely hindered by its inability to efficiently manage the staggering amount of info required to build. Yeah, that info was trapped in proprietary file formats or sitting in physical filing cabinets buried in endless email chains. or held solely in the memories of your most experienced superintendents.
But the convergence of cloud architecture and artificial intelligence has finally liberated that information. Which connects directly back to you, the listener. If your operations team is constantly bogged down by coordination failures, You know, if you're part of that 74 % struggling with clash detection, or if your project managers are just drowning in the administrative overhead of daily logs, version control conflicts, and RFI tracking, you really need to recognize this new reality. Because suffering through those specific pain points is now totally optional. Yes, optional pain. The technology exists today to resolve them, giving you the infrastructure to scale your operations gracefully, rather than simply throwing more, you know, burnt out... human hours at a broken process, these tools
provide massive leverage. They really do. They allow construction professionals to focus their energy on strategy, complex problem solving, and managing the actual physical build, rather than functioning as highly paid data entry clerks. And that concept leaves us with a final, somewhat provocative thought to ponder as we close out this deep dive today. We are watching these platforms rapidly eliminate the tedious administrative tasks of the industry. So if the historical role of a project manager has essentially been to act as the ultimate information chaser. Hunting down updates, cross -referencing files, manually updating schedules. Right. How does this technological shift redefine their entire existence? When the AI is chasing the information for them, what becomes their primary function? It's a great
question. As we move forward. How will this complete transition from managing data to managing insights redefine who you hire, what skills you prioritize, and how you train the next generation of construction leadership? It demands a completely different mindset. I really think the premium skill is no longer organization. It is judgment. Oh, well said. The frontier has fundamentally shifted. If you know a contractor who is dealing with coordination nightmares or drowning in project admin, send them this episode. It could completely change how they look at their tech stack and operations. Hit follow on whatever app you're listening on so you don't miss tomorrow's Intel. Visit smartbusinessautomator .com. Thanks for taking the deep dive with us today. See you next time.